'Labor Practices Paper Essay\r'

'M whatsoever companies argon employ fret shops to prevarication their products at a oft quantifys cheaper court. However, there is a often deeper approach of using fret shops then what stooge be position in fiscal value. I think it is time hatful begin to dispense what effort shops be doing to the flock in this world and how grave they go off be. Sweat shops may keep up companies money, but you do not want your troupe exposed on the password beca economic consumption your crusade shop in Bangladesh caught fire and killed 1,000 employees beca aim fire guard duty device regulations were not met.\r\nSweat shops atomic number 18 used to describe a subcontracting system where the middle gay earns profits from the margin surrounded by what they were paid and what they paid come out of the closet to their deeders. That margin is referred to be parturiencyed from the employees due to them receiving minimal cook up, puddles enormous excessive hours, and in u n beneficial, unstable working conditions. Companies will rally smaller, poorer countries that score little to no regulations as far as safety and commit go to establish these travail shops in. They pay their employees as oft(prenominal) in a month as what many of us would start out in a day. They ar as well as rided to work enormously hanker hours in conditions that argon extremely waste to their wellness.\r\nthither argon a high number of comfortably preventable deaths every form due to these sweat shops not meeting safety and health regulations. The contractors and managers of these establishments are in any case infamous for being highly shameful to their employees both mentally and physically. They would also target women and children for employment in sweat shops as they were manipulated much more easily than men. Also, they were much less likely to punish against the managers. Sweat shops often force people into working in these conditions. The people expe ct no survival but to do so as they ache families to take care of and without these sweat shops work would be placed elsewhere leaving them without any work at all.\r\n galore(postnominal) companies, especially in the habiliment industry, are using these sweat shops to increase profits, lower cost to customer, and cope with different companies. Consumers tranquillise buy into the product no matter that it is made in much(prenominal) a dangerous milieu where people lose their lives. There was an approximate total of 1,500 sweat shop garment histrion deaths in 2012. However, companies are stable using sweat shops because it does not affect the consumer’s choice to buy their product, their prices are decreased, and they are selling more product.\r\n large corporations and companies in other countries have paved the way for sweat shops. Other companies are bloodline to play a dedicate in this as they are looking for ways to compete with the companies already doing so. Companies in other countries can easily shape other companies into placing sweat shops in their locations due to minimum safety and labor right requirements.\r\nConsumers should staidly consider researching the products you use and ascertain where they come from, how they were made, and what type of environment were they made in. Consumers should then conk out purchasing items made from those companies using sweat shops to produce their product. Do you really think the apparel your wearing was worth 1,500 people dying in 2012? Laws should also be implemented that stockpile these companies responsible for these workers compensation and working conditions.\r\nIt is the contractor’s right to do this so companies can easily hide cornerstone these contractors. By enforcing these laws we would significantly chasten this problem. Companies calm may chose to manufacturing their product in other country but those workers would straight be receiving adequate pay alon g with a safe work environment without the long, extensive hours. In 1999, California passed gather Bill 633, which is a law that holds garment manufacturers and retailers responsible for employee wages and safety.\r\nI think it is intelligible why companies chose to do this as they are trying to save money, however this can quiet be done without the use of sweat shops. Products can still be manufactured at a lower cost in other countries without forcing employees to work for inadequate pay and in unsafe conditions working long exhausting hours. Major retailers could really get the ball curlicue for reducing the amount of sweat shops used. Smaller companies and the competition would no longer have to amend to sweat shops if they were able to compete with these major corporations that do use them.\r\nSo, we should keep in heed next time we are clothes shopping at the mall. We should consider what products may have resulted in someone losing their living to manufacture. Itâ€⠄¢s true, sweat shops bring low costs. However, like I express at the beginning of this paper, it is a cost that cuts much deeper than anything that can be placed into monetary value.\r\nReferences:\r\nhttp://www.laborrights.org/industries/apparel\r\nhttps://www.mtholyoke.edu/~nshah/fashioncrimes/Sweatshops.html\r\n'