Investigation into social media remarks

Investigation into social media remarksConviction before an Investigation Takes Rights outside fromboth the Victims and the AccusedA recent uproar at the Dalhousie dentistry educational institution is leaving both sides of the business feeling wronged. The rock is ground on the completely(a)eged(a) remarks affix on a mystic Facebook page for a theme referred to as the Class of DDS Gentle manpower which includes 13 members. It of late came to light that some of the students affirm been accused of posting blood-redly familiar remarks directed towards women on that Facebook page. Some of the comments directly reference students from that dentistry kin. The chromatography column argues that the overt cardinal suspension is still beneficial for the culprits and in no federal agency helps to foster the victims in which the harmful cozy comments were directed towards. I support this editorials perspective about the charge the in heretofore overseed this chemise whi ch illustrates a lack of consistency. The attention given to the perspective of the victims that ar come to with this case is non justified entirely I every(prenominal)ow for be critiquing the seeds reasoning and arguing that the accused students should be suspend. I will argue that not all 13 students should be reprimanded based on the instruction provided at bottom this editorial as this piece illustrates a complex view of which members be truly the wrongdoers. I will too argue that a variation of classes should be offered based on the partial tvirtuoso suspension the checking has initiated to honour the idea that no suspect should be deemed guilty before a proper evaluation of all the information.The antecedent of this editorial strongly argues that all 13 members of this Facebook page should be hang up based on what was posted on Facebook. The author clearly states. the violent, misogynist comments posted by some of the members of the private Facebook page called Class of DDS Gentlemen (Thestar.com). Comments write some female students from the class, asking who would you like to hate fk? where they rated their choices. Other posts joked about using chloroform on women. In an otherwise(prenominal) post, a woman is shown in a bikini with a furnish that says Bang until stress is relieved or unconscious (girl) (Thestar.com). The severity of the supposed postings by some members of this class illustrates the violent sexual content illustrating the regard to investigate those who posted this information. Not all 13 students should be penalize if they did not all make any comments affiliated with this harmful content. The offset thing that must be reviewed is ex comportly which members of the group directly posted the comments or supporting discussion that was linked to a sexually violent nature of conversation.The authors argument that the school did not handle the situation properly is relevant, however the outcome that is proposed defie s the legal system that is meant to fly the coop in a fair and just bureau. Firstly the author is veracious in indicating anger that it was nearly a month after women complained that something was do by the school. In support of following the proper procedures of a evaluator system the school should befool acted immediately. The author indicates that the action should have been a full suspension. The argument that is offered indicates so far. Dalhousie has gone a long way towards balancing the rights of the accused and those of potential victims. However, it has fallen short on one important point it should suspend the 13 men involved from classes as comfortably as clinics (Thestar.com). The point is not well argued as it defies the precise idea of rights that entitle the accused to a fair proceeding. The school has suspended thestudents partially indicating a grave concern that these men atomic number 18 in contact with innocent patients within the clinical component of t his semester. The author argues, the partial suspension is serious. 13 fourth-year students plundernot work with patients or classmates in the schools dental clinic, a requirement for graduation this spring (Thestar.com). The event that the school has taken action to treasure patients is a strong argument that is presented by the author. In agreeing with this opinion, the lack of attention to the female students in the class is alarming, as they have either directly or indirectly have been spoken about within a violent and sexualized context by those accused fellow classmates. The authors concern is valid, however, I will argue that they should not be suspended from class but should be offered an independent study period go the accusations are creation investigated.The initiative issue that is recognized within this editorial is the wrongful grouping of all members of this Facebook group as existence regarded as directly involved with the accusations that are macrocosm made. The author argues that some of the members posted those comments. It is recognized that simply being a part of a group does not make everyone needs responsible for the deeds that whitethorn be performed by several members of that party. The author of this editorial indicates that those who are guilty of posting such degrading and violently abusive comments should be punished. This is justifiable however, the need to learn that those who are guilty of these very actions that are being described must be clarified. This editorial continuously calls for the suspension of all 13 men however, this is a damage argument. The need to act in a just expressive style as argued in the editorial on behalf of the victims should also be extended to those who may be in the group but may not have offered any of the negative remarks being reviewed. The recognition that there could be members of the group who may not have added comments must be acknowledged. It is important to ensure only those co nnected with posting those comments face the ramifications of being investigated and facing the makeshift rules issued by the school during this process.The second argument offered reinforces the necessity of issuing a fair trial to ensure that both sides of this conflict are hardened in a just manner. The editorial suggests for the immediate suspension from all classes of the 13 members of this Facebook group. That is unfair to the rights of those who currently have been accused of this action. The need for a fair trial is necessary before such extreme and final exam action can be made. That direct suspension could jeopardize the school career of these students. Should they be ready innocent, or connected to foul satisfy this represents an unfair situation for the students. The editorial indicates that the victims should be treated with respect and that a vestibular sense needs to be struck between the opposing parties. That being said the author is correct that the balance of arbitrator should be maintained. The suggestion that should be offered is a compromise between what the editorial has suggested as well as the actions that the school has taken. To suspend the students is to illustrate that they are guilty but this has not been determined as yet as the investigation is still under way. The school has already acted in a harmful manner by taking action a month after the information was brought to their attention. The suggestion is to let the accused students remain connected with the professors (outside of the classroom) based on the current scenario. They have paid their tuition and are entitled to be educated until this matter is fully investigated and resolved. The school feels that they should not be able to interact with clinical patients to foster those individuals should these students be found of wrongdoing. That being said, that same courtesy must be extended to the other students in the classroom. Specific females in the class were ridic uled and referenced in a sexually violent manner that is quite disturbing. Their rights must be protected as they may feel threatened and the school must act accordingly. Another sheath that may be used to offer a correlation to this case could be reviewed in the case of a nurture who may be accessed of abuse. The children are removed from custody to ensure that they are protected while the matter is investigated. The school must also protect these female students during this time. The suggestion, however, of suspending the accused students fails to ensure the rights of those men. The editorial argues for the balance of rights to be performed within this scenario. To ensure the women are offered a fair set of rights also means the accused men should also be treated in a fair manner. Justice can only work if everyone is treated equally. If the arbitrator system does not adhere to that model of equilibrium, then no one is safe, undermining the freedom of everyone. The editorial do es not offer a sense of balance as suggested by the need for suspension as that illustrates a exposition of guilty before a trial has even begun. The women must be protected and creating an alternative level of study for the accused students becomes pertinent as further investigations are completed.The editorial takes a strong stance on the actions that Dalhousie has taken in light of the postings that have been made public. The necessity to be ready to properly deal with these types of concerns swiftly and justly illustrates the need to protect victims at the centre of these cases. The editorial rightfully highlights an imbalance between the victims and the guess culprits. The flaw in this work indicates the passing of judgment before a rightful investigation has been made. Accusing all 13 men and verbalise they must be suspended undermines the integrity of the justice system. To use the justice system to protect these women means adhering to the rules that govern that very syst em. Firstly, the determination of the men who are connected to the comments should be found. Only those men should be offered another(prenominal) form of schooling outside of the current parameters of class lectures and clinical practice. The schools failure to immediately address this issue is where the tension of being perceived as flippant about the safety and well-being of the victims is recognized. unmatched month is far too long to take action against the allegations of sexually violent comments being made against classmates. The school must set an example that they will immediately act in a fair manner to both sides to ensure that the reputation of the school is not tarnished. Suspending the students before a full investigation of the case fails to respect the justice system. The fulfillment of the guidelines that promote justice is necessary to protect these women as well as those only suspected of this crime. The responsible thing to do is to act right out and prevent any emotional turmoil, which results in the suspected students being investigated while continuing their classes in a diminished and altered capacity. The threat of sexual violence, even in a joking manner, is unethical and to combat that trouble acting in an ethical and just way is necessary and can only be achieved by fulfilling a thorough investigation and maintaining the rights of all parties at all times.Works CitedDalhousie Should Suspend Accused Dental Students from Classes Editorial.Thestar.com. The Star, 6 Jan. 2015. Web.