'Canadian Contribution for World Peace\r'

'I defend evidence Suresh Canagarajahs article ‘ The Fortunate Traveler: Shuttling amongst Communities and Literacies by Economy Class ‘. He is a good releaser and he has many good idea rough acquirement English to improve literacies. In Suresh Canagarajahs opinion, e real English learners need to c on the whole back a adaptive fashion, that leave behind grow their interests to learn English. Countries tradition is influencing local peoples aethestic standard, so many readers ar hard to wear foreign written material style. As a entreprenant writer, when they set about to conflicting and competing in assorted communities, they will adjust their make-up style.Suresh believes that â€Å"a curiosity towards the language, the ability to intuit languistic rules from reflectivity of actual usage, a metalinguistic awareness of the arranging behind languages, and the ability to creatively transact meaning in text are the good dodging to improve literacy†. In my heart, Chinese is my mother language, and I evermore talk with my Chinese friends. Im afraid of grammatical construction something to for English speaker. When I sit on the subway or bus, sometimes I will pay attention to somebodys conversation.At the beginning, I butt catch a critical information, but gradually I sapidity its hard to follow them. At last, I feel depressed and give up. In Canada, English is used in everywhere. We substructure learn many grammar and syntactic from thither as long as conservatively observed. When we read a long article, we possibly feel its difficult to finish and take its meaning. I was accustomed to translate intelligence service by word, I know its a bad reading habit. In fact, generalise the meaning in context rump accurately know what message power want to deliver to readers. I conceive of these suggestions are utilizable.When Suresh Canagarajah come to western academician fellowship, he hasnt get the expected praise. Su resh believes that â€Å"the exaggerated, torrid personalized style of writing wasnt universally appreciated in the academic community”. Because westbound academic community favour to restrained and rigid essay kinda than personalized and passionate essay. Their tradition and finale influence the writing style, so they are hard to accept foreign writing style. For example , Chinese people count on some Chinese composes opus is very nice, but none of Chinese author can obtain the Nobel Prize in Literature.Because Western audience cant adapt Chinese writing style and understand the meaning. check to Suresh (1986), the conflicts he has faced as he shuttled between his native community and Western academic community generated many useful insights into the ideological and rhetorical challenges in academic communication. He believes that ” be humble when careen knowledge, adopt a reflective scholarship attitude, critical questioning of dominant practices, and contex tually grounded theorization are the good way to treat conflicts.As a entreprenant writer, when he faced to conflicting and competing in different communities, they will adjust their writing style. Thus, he can try some different kinds of writing style to adapt the audience all over the world . This is a continuously move forward success. I have learned some good strategy to improve lieracy from the article by Suresh Canagarajah, I will try these ideas in learning English. In addition, if I want to write some good essay to enthral audiences in Canada, I think I need to change my writing style. Suresh is a good model for me to improve lieracy.\r\n'